From: Mark Phillips <mark@mo...> - 2004-10-28 20:18:23
On Oct 28, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
> Matt Feifarek wrote:
>> Hi Chas.
>> Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd
>> say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I
>> know that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is
>> not yet, so I expect this explains the wait for v 1.0.
> I think Webware needs an automated test suite and better documentation
> order to be considered 1.0. The time is way overdue for a new release
> the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps
> forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently
> seems to
> have the time or inclination to do it.
> - Geoff
A fool rushes in...
The automated test suite must surely be a critical path item for a 1.0
release but perhaps a current release (0.8.2?) is more useful in the
short term. I have a few days between projects starting next week and I
am willing to put in the time to create a new release provided a
seasoned resource (or two) volunteers to deal with the clueless
questions I am certain to have. I am quite new to the CVS. However, I
am getting the hang of it insofar as updating webware projects with
current snapshots and I have read the cederqvist document.
BTW, I will not be offended if this offer flies like a stone chicken. I
am sure there are others on this list far better qualified than I.
- Mark Phillips