From: Stuart Donaldson <stu@as...> - 2003-01-08 06:02:29
So I would like to suggest a protocol for addressing the bug fixes and
patches that are listed on the sourceforge site.
If a developer is going to take on one of the bugs or patches to review
and update into CVS, I suggest that they assign the bug to themselves
first. This lets everyone know that they are the owner of the issue for
the time being.
Doing this will help to minimize duplicate effort, such as the update I
was testing, prior to performing a cvs commit on the delete cookie bug
which Ian just committed... ;-)
If the bug/patch is assigned to someone, and you want to see it fixed
sooner than they seem to be getting to it, then just ask them about it.
Anyway, thanks Ian... ;-)
From: Ian Bicking <ianb@co...> - 2003-01-08 07:56:59
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 00:02, Stuart Donaldson wrote:
> If a developer is going to take on one of the bugs or patches to review
> and update into CVS, I suggest that they assign the bug to themselves
> first. This lets everyone know that they are the owner of the issue for
> the time being.
Sounds like a good idea, I'll be sure to do that in the future.
Ian Bicking Colorstudy Web Development
PGP: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x9B9E28B7
4869 N Talman Ave, Chicago, IL 60625 / (773) 275-7241