At this stage I believe with one or two unwary steps we could head down the road of religious debate...so I'll tread carefully.
 
I will say, however, that when I separate model from view from controller, one of my own personal motivations is to have the code workspace that the view designer plays/works in be uncluttered by model and view code.  As a result, I would never put any model code into a template or psp file.  If you find yourself writing sql or database access code in a psp file thats a pretty good sign you've wandered off the path a bit.  Its possible I misunderstood what you're saying, so take my words with a grain of salt.
 
And, as with all religions, you have to decide what you believe in and what fits your circumstance best.
 
tabs suck, spaces RULE!!!
 
jd


From: webware-discuss-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:webware-discuss-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of maker joe
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:08 PM
To: Discussion of Webware for Python including feedback and proposals.
Subject: Re: [Webware-discuss] forwarding req.values ?

hi all
 
tim thank you for you clear response and also thank you all for your time and examples
 
im still thinking that psp is the best and easy way to have the job done on a MVC scenario
 
all modeling/controller and db connections files  are going to be built inside psp files  <% %>  that shoud be included on view psp files, rendering all html (produced by a wysyswyg page builder including all needed    <%=rercords/vars %>)
 
psp compiler takes care of all PY code an generate the classes automatically for me
including all webkit page and the related servlets
 
to handle vars thru out the servlets i will use post/get and mostly session
 
if anybody thinks that im wrong in anyway i would like to have an input to clarify myself once more
 
by the way i also would like to know if there is a place to upload my snippets or download of someone else  and have the way to run them as a WEBWARESTORE of online running examples to discuss and or learn at the same time
 
best regards
makerjoe (jose luis hrydziuszko)-(argentina)
 


 
On 12/5/06, Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:21:22 -0300, <makerjoe@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi chris:
> if I avoid "trans.application().forward(trans, 'list.psp')"
> <%
> req.setField('ww', ww)
> req.setField('rr', rr)
> req.setField('xx', xx)
> ###################   trans.application().forward(trans, 'list.psp')
> %>
> <form action="list.psp" method="post">
> <INPUT type="hidden" name="aa" value="<%=aa%>">
> <INPUT type="hidden" name="bb" value="<%=bb%>">
> <INPUT type="hidden" name="cc" value="<%=cc%>">
>
> Does all req.values (aa,bb,cc,ww,rr,xx)will be send to list.psp ?
>

No.  req.setField only affects other consumers of this request in
Webware.  When you use forward(), the same request object will be
inherited by the new script, so it will see them.  In the case you have
there, you are writing HTML back to the web browser, at which point this
request object will be deleted.  The response from the client's browser
represents a brand-new request, and will only contain those variables
that you wrote in the HTML form.

--
Tim Roberts, timr@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Webware-discuss mailing list
Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss