> Ideally, coverage should be > 80% but we currently only
> achieve 45%. Please have a look at
Personally, I think this is pretty good, given that we haven't had
coverage statistics before. I'm not sure vtk was every that much better
than this (although I'm sure Dan will correct me if that is incorrect).
One should also be wary of these figures, as in some cases it would be
silly to try and achieve 100%, as each if-statement would have to be
tested by a special case test routine.