From: Peter Vanroose <peter_vanroose@ya...>  20110205 17:21:53

Thanks for reporting this! I've corrected it as you suggested.  Peter.  Den fre 20110204 skrev Dominic Wang <dominic@...>: This is just to report that an added constructor for the class vnl_cross_product_matrix in revision r28992: line 35: vnl_cross_product_matrix(const vnl_double_3& v) { set(v.data_block()); } caused an implicit conversion problem: error: call of overloaded ‘vnl_cross_product_matrix(vnl_vector_fixed<double, 3u>)’ is ambiguous note: candidates are: vnl_cross_product_matrix::vnl_cross_product_matrix(const vnl_vector<double>&) note: vnl_cross_product_matrix::vnl_cross_product_matrix(const vnl_double_3&) This may cause a problem to users relying on the implicit conversion between vnl_vector_fixed and vnl_vector when the code goes to final release. Possible fix may be to introduce an explicit constructor with vnl_vector_fixed doing the conversion within it, or just a vnl_vector_fixed version of the constructor. Dominic 