Re: [Vxl-maintainers] vxl 1.14 beta 1 - MSVS 8.0 XP test build

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 454-5900

Yes, I mean build errors.  Looks like they have already been fixed.  I did not see them in later dashboard builds.

In a few minutes I'll send another email about a Linux/gcc test build.

Fred

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brendan McCane [mailto:bre...@gm...] 
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 3:24 PM
> To: Wheeler, Frederick W (GE, Research)
> Cc: Vxl-maintainers
> Subject: Re: [Vxl-maintainers] vxl 1.14 beta 1 - MSVS 8.0 XP 
> test build
> 
> Urk. By errors I assume you mean build errors? If so, that is bad. Is
> someone working on fixing those errors? Or have they already been
> fixed?
> 
> On 9 March 2010 03:40, Wheeler, Frederick W (GE, Research)
> <wh...@ge...> wrote:
> >
> > On a MSVC 8.0 XP build of 1.14b1 I get a few errors in
> > clsfy_random_forest_builder.cxx.  These are the only 
> errors.  The same
> > errors appeared on this dashboard build from about 4 days ago:
> >
> > http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?buildid=554720
> >
> > Test results ...
> >
> > 96% tests passed, 33 tests failed out of 814
> >
> > Total Test time (real) = 155.05 sec
> >
> > The following tests FAILED:
> >        395 - clsfy_test_binary_hyperplane (Not Run)
> >        396 - clsfy_test_binary_pdf_classifier (Not Run)
> >        397 - clsfy_test_k_nearest_neighbour (Not Run)
> >        398 - clsfy_test_smo_1 (Not Run)
> >        399 - clsfy_test_rbf_svm_smo (Not Run)
> >        400 - clsfy_test_adaboost (Not Run)
> >        401 - clsfy_test_direct_boost (Not Run)
> >        402 - clsfy_test_binary_threshold_1d (Not Run)
> >        403 - clsfy_test_mean_square_1d (Not Run)
> >        404 - clsfy_test_logit_loss_function (Not Run)
> >        405 - clsfy_test_binary_hyperplane_logit (Not Run)
> >        406 - clsfy_test_binary_1d_wrapper (Not Run)
> >        407 - clsfy_test_binary_tree (Not Run)
> >        408 - clsfy_test_random_forest (Not Run)
> >        493 - mfpf_test_edge_finder (Not Run)
> >        494 - mfpf_test_norm_corr1d (Not Run)
> >        495 - mfpf_test_norm_corr2d (Not Run)
> >        496 - mfpf_test_profile_pdf (Not Run)
> >        497 - mfpf_test_region_pdf (Not Run)
> >        498 - mfpf_test_region_finder (Not Run)
> >        499 - mfpf_test_pose (Not Run)
> >        500 - mfpf_test_mr_point_finder (Not Run)
> >        501 - mfpf_test_patch_data (Not Run)
> >        502 - mfpf_test_dp_snake (Not Run)
> >        503 - mfpf_test_pose_predictor (Not Run)
> >        647 - bsta_test_parzen_sphere (Failed)
> >        655 - bsta_test_beta (Failed)
> >        660 - bsta_algo_test_von_mises_update (Failed)
> >        661 - bsta_algo_test_beta_updater (Failed)
> >        699 - brip_test_mask (Failed)
> >        722 - bvxm_test_rpc_registration_process (Failed)
> >        747 - brec_test_part_hierarchy_learner (Failed)
> >        778 - test_octree_kernel_operator (Failed)
> > Errors while running CTest
> > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\CMake 
> 2.8\bin\ctest.exe"'
> > : return code '0x8'
> > Stop.
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Brendan McCane [mailto:bre...@gm...]
> >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 12:04 AM
> >> To: Vxl-maintainers
> >> Subject: [Vxl-maintainers] vxl 1.14 beta 1
> >>
> >> G'day Maintainers,
> >>
> >> I've packaged up a beta release for vxl 1.14. I have 
> tested it on a 64
> >> bit linux machine (running Fedora 8) with the following results:
> >>
> >> 98% tests passed, 13 tests failed out of 817
> >>
> >> The following tests FAILED:
> >>       104 - vnl_test_sparse_matrix (SEGFAULT)
> >>       651 - bsta_test_parzen_sphere (Failed)
> >>       659 - bsta_test_beta (Failed)
> >>       662 - bsta_algo_test_mean_shift (Failed)
> >>       664 - bsta_algo_test_von_mises_update (Failed)
> >>       665 - bsta_algo_test_beta_updater (Failed)
> >>       702 - brip_test_mask (Failed)
> >>       704 - brip_test_extrema (OTHER_FAULT)
> >>       725 - bvxm_test_rpc_registration_process (Failed)
> >>       739 - bmdl_classify_process (SEGFAULT)
> >>       750 - brec_test_part_hierarchy_learner (Failed)
> >>       753 - brec_test_hierarchy_detector2 (SEGFAULT)
> >>       781 - test_octree_kernel_operator (Failed)
> >> Errors while running CTest
> >>
> >> The main concern for me is test 104 failing, although I 
> have a vague
> >> feeling we have discussed this issue before (couldn't find 
> it in the
> >> archives though). It seems to be a persistent failure on 
> the dashboard
> >> too. I'm not sure if we want to do anything about it.
> >>
> >> Could someone download and test the release candidate please
> >> (especially on a Windows machine).
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Brendan
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----------------
> >> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Vxl-maintainers mailing list
> >> Vxl...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vxl-maintainers
> >>
> >
> > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> > Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Vxl-maintainers mailing list
> > Vxl...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vxl-maintainers
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> Brendan
> 