We have lots of compiler errors now. If your fix is not compatible with our distributed vxl, then I think you should back it out.

Bill

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Arnaud GELAS <arnaud_gelas@hms.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Luis,

I have just committed the changes.

Arnaud


On 07/13/2010 07:00 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
Sorry that I'm getting to this late...

Replacing mult with the * operator
sounds like a good solution.

Arnaud:

   Do you want to commit that change ?


   Thanks


        Luis


-----------------------------------------------
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen@gmail.com> wrote:
Luis,

Should me modify the FEM code to use operator* instead of mult? A user on insight-users just reported the same issue.

Bill


On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Arnaud GELAS <arnaud_gelas@hms.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Peter,

With your change it is now compiling without any problem. Thanks for taking care of that!

Arnaud

Note: I replaced the mult by the operator *, it was perfectly working (compiling, tests were OK).



On 06/12/2010 04:52 AM, Peter Vanroose wrote:
You'll either have to update line 265 of
ITK/Code/Numerics/FEM/itkFEMLinearSystemWrapperVNL.cxx
to use the operator*() method of vnl_sparse_matrix<T>,
or make the mult() method of vnl_sparse_matrix<T> public again in your copy of vxl.

Methods mult(), add() and subtract() of vnl_sparse_matrix<T> will revert to "public" in the next vxl release, be it with a deprecation warning.
        
-- Peter.