From: Servilio A. P. <afr...@mc...> - 2011-12-09 17:02:33
|
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:37:40 -0500, Demian Katz <dem...@vi...> wrote: > I don't think putting hasSummary/hasNotes keys into the top-level > location array will work since the foreach loop will treat these > special keys as if they are additional holdings -- but your idea of > putting all the collected data into the first copy would solve the > problem without requiring template changes in 1.x and then we can > switch to a better-designed data structure in 2.0. I was planning on > reimplementing holds in 2.0 soon anyway (maybe next week), so I'll try > to take care of this at the same time. Would it help me sending an initial patch for this? I would adapt the function you sent to place the summaries in the first holding of the location, and hook this into HoldLogic. > Thanks for the suggestion! You are welcome! Servilio |