The only pattern I can spot is that... sorting comes out with an empty value when the raw value starts with "(" ?... Strange (the sequel)...


2013/4/26 Filipe MS Bento (UA) <fsb@ua.pt>
Strange... here is a sample of mines (after all, and regarding topic, they are all OPAC related ones):

Skipped entries for Record ID [000001660] (Lucene docid: 1400399) because the number of sort keys didn't match the number of stored values.
Fields in dewey-sort: []
Fields in dewey-raw: [(675)1]

Skipped entries for Record ID [000001661] (Lucene docid: 1400400) because the number of sort keys didn't match the number of stored values.
Fields in dewey-sort: []
Fields in dewey-raw: [(675)1]

Skipped entries for Record ID [000002938] (Lucene docid: 1401560) because the number of sort keys didn't match the number of stored values.
Fields in dewey-sort: []
Fields in dewey-raw: [(031)001]

Skipped entries for Record ID [000003593] (Lucene docid: 1402119) because the number of sort keys didn't match the number of stored values.
Fields in dewey-sort: []
Fields in dewey-raw: [(031)001]

Skipped entries for Record ID [000249767] (Lucene docid: 1408649) because the number of sort keys didn't match the number of stored values.
Fields in dewey-sort: []
Fields in dewey-raw: [(084.5)]



2013/4/26 Filipe MS Bento (UA) <fsb@ua.pt>
I too do thank you, Mark, for this new *release* of browse-indexing.jar, because I also have a couple (of hundreds) records (OPAC and Harvested) that give me that same error.

Just running it right now...

All the best / have a nice weekend,

Filipe




2013/4/26 Mark Triggs <mark@dishevelled.net>
Right.  I've updated the version here to print the Record ID too:

  http://dishevelled.net/browse-indexing.jar

Cheers,

Mark


Mark Triggs <mark@dishevelled.net> writes:

> Ah, sorry.  That docid is Lucene's internal identifier (a sequence
> number) and is distinct from VuFind's record ID.  While I'm at it, I'll
> see if I can change that warning to print the Record ID as well.
>
> Mark
>
>
> Jay Roos <jayroos@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Maybe I'm looking at this wrong somehow? Is the docid reported by
>> alphabrowse indexer the same as the record id used by VuFind? If not, what
>> is it? Is it just a sequence number?
>>
>> This is one of the problem records:
>>
>> Skipped entries for docid 280694 because the number of sort keys didn't
>> match the number of stored values.
>> Fields in title_sort: []
>> Fields in title_fullStr: [Thunder Road / James Axler.]
>>
>> However there is no record 280694. The title does exist in VuFind as record
>> 647959. So I'm guessing the other number is from somewhere else.
>>
>> All of that aside, it looks like I have a problem with record going through
>> the title_sort routine.

--
Mark Triggs
<mark@dishevelled.net>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
_______________________________________________
Vufind-tech mailing list
Vufind-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vufind-tech