From: Mike Clark <Mike.Clark@Cinven.com> - 2004-01-28 16:02:00
> I'm sorry that kept out of most discussions lately - not=20
> because I don't
> car anymor but because I simply hav no time (I need to finish=20
> that diploma
I think your thesis comes higher in the pecking order m8 ;)
> There came a lot of ideas through the list which collides=20
> with the current
> database design which - as Mike pointed out - comes from the=20
> time "where
> VideoDB was simple" :-) I don't know about you, but I feel it=20
> is time to
> really think of redesigning large parts of the database.
> What do you think? Does it make sense to rape the current DB=20
> design any
> further to support more user requests or should we think about a new,
> better thought on DB structure?
Hmm. Its certainly an idea, but depends how much rejigging the db =
Personally I think there are a number of improvement areas...but I =
exactly call these major changes.
I think the main db structure is pretty good already. Probably the most
important thing to change was what Andi brought up yesterday with =
I think this would be worth doing, but overall I dont think the db needs =
that much different.
> Of course this would delay a lot of development more until I have some
> time again. I really feel bad that I can't do anything for my=20
> "baby" right
> now :-/
Yes this is true, but if it needs doing...it needs doing