From: Haywood F. <eri...@gm...> - 2007-05-29 00:35:50
|
Dear Sirs, i am buiding an uml from source. The kernel version is 2.6.15.4. My gcc version is 2.95.4 as recommended in readme file from kernel .bz2 file. I am using Ubuntu 6.06. With or without applying appropriate uml patch i receive the error output below. There is c files with bad syntax/semantics in kernel sources ? Thanks for any help. Ernani. .............. CC arch/um/kernel/uaccess.o CC arch/um/kernel/um_arch.o arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c: In function `linux_main': arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c:419: warning: long unsigned int format, different type arg (arg 2) CC arch/um/kernel/umid.o CC arch/um/kernel/user_util.o CC arch/um/kernel/initrd.o CC arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.o CC arch/um/kernel/syscall.o CC arch/um/kernel/skas/clone.o CC arch/um/kernel/skas/exec_kern.o CC arch/um/kernel/skas/mem.o CC arch/um/kernel/skas/mem_user.o arch/um/kernel/skas/mem_user.c:57: warning: #warning Need to look up userspace_pid by cpu arch/um/kernel/skas/mem_user.c: In function `map': arch/um/kernel/skas/mem_user.c:203: parse error before `[' arch/um/kernel/skas/mem_user.c:203: parse error before `]' make[2]: ** [arch/um/kernel/skas/mem_user.o] Erro 1 make[1]: ** [arch/um/kernel/skas] Erro 2 make: ** [arch/um/kernel] Erro 2 |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2007-05-29 02:50:41
|
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:35:49PM -0300, Haywood Floyd wrote: > The kernel version is 2.6.15.4. Why? You're probably not going to get a lot of help for such an ancient UML. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com |
From: Haywood F. <eri...@gm...> - 2007-05-29 23:03:19
|
You are saying that time the kernel 2.6.15.4 was the newest kernel an 2.6.15.4 based uml machine will not work ? :) Thanks I will get the newest kernel source. I will need apply patch file for this new version ? Ernani 2007/5/28, Jeff Dike <jd...@ad...>: > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:35:49PM -0300, Haywood Floyd wrote: > > The kernel version is 2.6.15.4. > > Why? > > You're probably not going to get a lot of help for such an ancient UML. > > Jeff > > -- > Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com > |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2007-05-30 01:11:10
|
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:03:09PM -0300, Haywood Floyd wrote: > You are saying that time the kernel 2.6.15.4 was the newest kernel > an 2.6.15.4 based uml machine will not work ? :) I totally don't understand what that is supposed to mean. However, no one is interested in figuring out what's wrong with something so old. > I will get the newest kernel source. > I will need apply patch file for this new version ? No. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com |
From: Haywood F. <eri...@gm...> - 2007-05-30 02:47:36
|
ok. thanks. i will try with 2.6.21.3 sources. 2007/5/29, Jeff Dike <jd...@ad...>: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:03:09PM -0300, Haywood Floyd wrote: > > You are saying that time the kernel 2.6.15.4 was the newest kernel > > an 2.6.15.4 based uml machine will not work ? :) > > I totally don't understand what that is supposed to mean. However, no > one is interested in figuring out what's wrong with something so old. > > > I will get the newest kernel source. > > I will need apply patch file for this new version ? > > No. > > Jeff > > -- > Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com > |