From: Jeff Dike <jdike@ka...> - 2001-08-13 21:32:00
> I'm assuming it will be a case of adding in a temp solution until you
> can restructure the memory later?
> I'd have more, but since ntpd and UML don't seem to love each other
> that much, it's a bit difficult (Is there an alternative to ntp which
> _does_ run under UML?).
The problem is that ntpd is doing an mlockall, which seems pretty gratuitous.
You might look into whether that's configurable. If it can be turned off,
then ntpd should work fine.