From: Jeff D. <jd...@ka...> - 2001-09-24 23:56:44
|
rc...@im... said: > It still doesn't work :-( Grrr > I tried to boot a kernel patched with > 2.4.9-5um, but it halted at "kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:108" > (something like that). In this case, it's the same error we have had > beforehand. I removed the FASTCALL that screwed the register (IIRC > %edx) and it booted, but I got a segfault (check the stack below). How about the usual symbol information about the faulting IP? > I > also tried the 2.4.9-9um version, but it didn't even boot. I got a > "Found a frame pointer on the stack" message. That's a bug I introduced in -9 which happens on 2.2 hosts. Either run it on 2.4 or use either -8 or 2.4.10-1um, which are essentially the same UML. Using something more recent would be good since the address space reorg happened after -5, and that could affect gprof and gcov. Jeff |