From: Jeff D. <jd...@ka...> - 2000-10-16 00:57:08
|
yd...@al... said: > This could at least be mentionned on the "compiling" page, don't you > think ? OK. What could I have put on the web site that would have prevented you from being confused? > However, I feel it is quite unexpected for a 2.2-based root_fr (as > Debian 2.2 is, and as others still are I guess) to require a > 2.4-specific feature. What's the difference between a 2.2 filesystem and a 2.4 filesystem? Not much. The devfs names in fstab are about it, and if you wanted to boot 2.4 without devfs, an existing 2.2 filesystem would probably work fine. Jeff |