Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - support checkstack

[Matt M. <mp...@se...>]

On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:22:16AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > Make checkstack work for UML.  We need to pass the underlying architecture
> > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl.
> > 
> > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager?
> 
> SUBARCH has a different meaning here.  For UML, it's the underlying,
> host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager.

Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we
ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside
checkstack.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.