From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2004-02-29 04:28:22
|
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 10:41:47PM -0400, Chris Watt wrote: > I'm not thrilled with UML's ability to acquire pty pairs itself > (it closes the master every time a process closes the tty, and it may not > get the same pty number when it re-opens), but it's simple enough to use a > wrapper that creates a pty master/slave pair (or several) and starts UML > up with ttys mapped to pty slaves (pts channel). This is why UML lets you pass in ttys as well. Open up the master end on the host, give the slave to UML, and you get exactly what you are looking for. Jeff |