Re: [uml-user] Experience with 2.4.22um

[Jeff D. <jd...@ad...>]

gm...@no... said:
> Debugging it was difficult - it  seemed to receive many signals (I set
> gdb to ignore USR1) a SEGV which  could be continued then finally an
> IRQ 2 which it could not handle.

Have it ignore SEGV as well.  Then your debugging environment should be clean.

I need stack traces if I'm going to debug crashes.

> ps. is there a new patch with the /dev/kmem fix? thanks 

I released it yesterday.

				Jeff