From: Kelly F. <um...@fe...> - 2003-03-22 18:28:07
|
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Kelly French wrote: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, i.t wrote: >=20 > > msg Freitag 21 M=E4rz 2003 21:34 by Kelly French: > > > Be aware that Ultraseek worked just fine in the UML during the first = day > > > or two. It only went crazy after it started it reindexing process. = =20 > >=20 > > what's the underlying fs? > >=20 > > Regards >=20 > ext3 on the host, ext3 in the UML. I think that's a bad thing, but I=20 > don't think it's a problem here. One of my normal hardware tests is to= =20 > just recompile a kernel over and over again all night. This worked fine= =20 > in the UML. >=20 > I'm open to suggestions though. Do you suggest I change either or both t= o=20 > ext2? >=20 > =09-kf I tried switching the UML to ext2 and it had the same results. Then I=20 tried switching the host to ext2, with the UML still at ext2, and it was=20 the same. =09-kf |