From: Matt Z. <md...@de...> - 2003-01-11 01:47:16
|
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:31:56PM -0500, David Coulson wrote: > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > >Try iputils-ping instead of netkit-ping and see if the results are > >different. > > It's consistantly 9.9 seconds with iputils-ping. Guess that's the > problem then. Hmm...I just checked the latest versions of both, and netkit-ping doesn't seem to do anything untoward...netkit-ping uses alarm() while iputils-ping uses setitimer(ITIMER_REAL,...). -- - mdz |