From: Steve B. <st...@sn...> - 2002-11-15 06:51:20
|
Sounds like you had the same problem as me with uml_switch. Here's the patch I posted on uml-devel which solves the problem for me. Don't know if Jeff will be including it in the next release of uml_utilities. Cheers, Steve Net Llama! wrote: > On 11/13/2002 05:45 PM, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'd first like to thank Jeff, and all those working on UML - it's a > > very exciting > > project. > > > > I'd like to know what the state of stability UML is in. I understand > > that there > > are two different modes of operation, tt (old), and skas (in dev). > > What is the > > stability rating (say on a 1-10 scale, where 10 = the stability of > > current x86 > > code) for tt, and skas. I guess why I'm asking is to get a better > > idea of how > > stable UML is for production purposes, and to get a better idea of > > *when* UML > > would be production ready. > > > It really depends on alot of factors. I've got two UML production > servers running with RH-7.3 as the host, and 2.4.18-36 as the UML > kernel, and both have been very reliable. However, i've had sporadic > problems with uml_switch where its self-terminated on occasion. It > might help if you explained how you were plannning to use UML. > |