Re: [uml-devel] Once more into kernel_thread()

[Jeff D. <jd...@ka...>]

hav...@gm... said:
> Applying the following patch solves my problems (4MB memory lost on
> each module unload). I have no idea wether it is 'right' or not.

It's not.  We had a fairly nasty bug a while back which was "fixed" by NULLing
mm and active_mm.

John seems to have more of a clue about what's right here than I do, so
I'd like to see his fix for the problem.

				Jeff