You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(32) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(2) |
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
2003 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(21) |
2006 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2001-02-11 20:10:19
|
Paul, there is something a little hairy about that patch -- it mostly applies okay, but refuses to create any new files you have included, namely the .inc files in make_include. I am gonna extract those by hand and apply them, then tar the whole mess up and send to you to make sure it still builds/tests okay on bsd. I builds and tests fine here on linux after applying... thanks rjf& |
From: Paul H. <ph...@fr...> - 2001-02-09 07:46:59
|
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Ron Forrester wrote: > thinking about removing STLport all together and just providing a > link to the stlport site. Not sure. Opinions are welcome. I must say, I'm not in love with it either, and I would not be the least bit upset if it were wished away to the cornfield. In fact, long term, I don't even think it needs to be there. Tripwire doesn't (directly) use even half the library. A nice project would be to ween tripwire off of STLport. Yes, I think its days are numbered. However, until then, I think it needs to stay. I think if tripwire can't find an existing STLport library on the system, it should compile its own. You gotta admit, STLport is not quite standard issue. It'd be a different story if it were something like libpcap or libncurses... Besides, we don't want people to go around installing STLport on all their machines now, do we? <removes toungue from cheek> ;-) -Paul. |
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2001-02-08 23:49:59
|
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 12:36:01AM +0100, Paul Herman wrote: > Anyway, your's to test. Feedback welcome. Have fun! Sweet. I am screwing with CVS on sourceforge currently -- thinking about removing STLport all together and just providing a link to the stlport site. Not sure. Opinions are welcome. At anyrate, I will probably get your changes into CVS sometime in the next week. Thanks much Paul. rjf& |
From: Paul H. <ph...@fr...> - 2001-02-08 23:37:00
|
Hi, After a short chat with Ron, I managed to come up with a revised patch against tripwire-2.3.0-src so that it compiles & links under FreeBSD (and almost OpenBSD.) I needed to add some small OS checks, and while I was there I fixed a few small -Wall errors. But... Beware! This does not include the STLport merge from my original patchset which fixed some pthread issues, so this will still produce broken code on FreeBSD (all executables will coredump upon exit.) I strongly recommend upgrading the STLport to 4.0 release, which runs great under both Linux and FreeBSD. Anyway, your's to test. Feedback welcome. Have fun! -Paul. |
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2001-02-08 20:02:49
|
I am moving/deleting some stuff -- will send another email as soon as it is working again. rjf& |
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2001-02-04 07:35:05
|
I just updated CVS with my first batch of changes, and uploaded a new src tarball to the files section. See ChangeLog in the tarball or CVS to see a list of what I changed. rjf& |
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2001-01-28 00:05:45
|
Contrary to how quiet it's been here lately, I have been working on the code a bit here and there. Here is what's coming up: - a small security enhancement recommended by Jarno (thanks!) -- that is, opening up our temp files with O_EXCL to make sure they don't already exist. - an additional security feature inherited from the commercial side of things: a new configuration variable called TEMPDIRECTORY. This can be set to a directory for which you (root) have full control of for permissions, unlike /tmp. - Another new configuration variable inherited from the commercial side called GLOBALEMAIL. This variable can be set to a list of email addresses, and anytime a report would normally be emailed, it will also be emailed to the recipients specified by this variable. This allows you to setup one or more people to always get a report. - Possibly, I will add some access rights code, again from commerical, which allows specification via config variables, of the default creation permissions for reports, databases, keys and configuration file. I hope to check this code in sometime next week. Additionally, if you all haven't seen the new documentation (end-user), head to the sourceforge tripwire page and visit the file downloads. It's quite good. Anyone else up to anything interesting? rjf& |
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2000-11-27 20:18:10
|
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 10:43:48AM -0500, Henry Zektser wrote: > To those who partake, I hope you've all had a happy Thanksgiving. Hope you had a great one Henry... rjf& |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-24 15:43:54
|
To those who partake, I hope you've all had a happy Thanksgiving. H _____________________________________________________________________________________ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-20 19:44:54
|
Yeah, I'm going to make it english-able, I was just doing a straight map for now, because I'm not totally sure about all the variables (ROOT for one still has me baffled, whats it do?). Thats eye candy tho, I'm still stuck on functionality;P As far as the output, it's going to be a separate class called TWCfgWriter that will make that easy. H >From: mat...@ho... >To: Henry Zektser <kde...@ho...> >Subject: Re: [Tripwire-dev] trippy screenshot >Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:32:04 +0000 (UTC) > > >Okay. Just a thought, but on the tripwire options page, you might want to >just put the options in english statements that aren't all concatenated >together. After all, if they are using this tool, it is to make there >life easier, and so they shouldn't have to sit there a minute or two >playing word games to figure, what is this option saying again? You can >always do the translation afterwards in the code. Looks like it will be >interesting. (Just for future consideration, you might want to make the >output from the program modular enough so that if the tripwire >configuration file moves to something like XML, it doesn't give you a >horrid time.) Cool Stuff. > >Matthew M. Copeland > > > > >On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Henry Zektser wrote: > > > After alot of work on getting tripwire working (thanks Ron), I've >finally > > got something to show for all of the effort. I'm putting up a screenshot > > (well, 3 of them) of QTWCfgEditor (a Qt widget). It's, well, a config >editor > > for tripwire:) Not much functionality in the editor itself yet, but the > > widget is finished (has get/set for all of the fields, and all that good > > stuff). I'm having major issues with sourceforge (I think I'm too stupid >to > > use it), so the screenshot is going up at > > http://elcongroup.com/qtwcfgedit.gif... Please let me know what you all > > think. This is where trippy is headed as far as the report viewer/policy > > editor/etc. Theres also going to be a java version of all this stuff, >but > > for the time being, Qt with windows (if I can find a cd of Qt for >windows) > > and linux binaries. Anyway, just a little update for you all, and some >proof > > that I am not, contrary to popular belief, dead. > > > > H > > >_________________________________________________________________________ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tripwire-dev mailing list > > Tri...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/tripwire-dev > > > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-20 18:34:33
|
After alot of work on getting tripwire working (thanks Ron), I've finally got something to show for all of the effort. I'm putting up a screenshot (well, 3 of them) of QTWCfgEditor (a Qt widget). It's, well, a config editor for tripwire:) Not much functionality in the editor itself yet, but the widget is finished (has get/set for all of the fields, and all that good stuff). I'm having major issues with sourceforge (I think I'm too stupid to use it), so the screenshot is going up at http://elcongroup.com/qtwcfgedit.gif... Please let me know what you all think. This is where trippy is headed as far as the report viewer/policy editor/etc. Theres also going to be a java version of all this stuff, but for the time being, Qt with windows (if I can find a cd of Qt for windows) and linux binaries. Anyway, just a little update for you all, and some proof that I am not, contrary to popular belief, dead. H _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
From: Ron F. <ro...@tr...> - 2000-11-17 17:38:04
|
Sounds good. Tripwire is moving to a new office starting today, so I will be out of touch until at best Monday, although I expect there to be some minor problems Monday as well. Have a great weekend, look forward to checking out Trippy... rjf& > -----Original Message----- > From: Henry Zektser [mailto:kde...@ho...] > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 9:13 AM > To: tri...@li... > Subject: Re: [Tripwire-dev] crafting better policy files - wildcards? > > > Sorry I've been out of touch, been setting up Qt 2.2.2 so I > can work on > trippy. I've actually got a working config file editor now, > yay! CVS code > coming soon. Anyways, your idea seems great. In fact, the > overhead of that > would be trivial. Just add a shell-out to a perl script that > blows up the > regexp to the -m i code, and you're all set.. > I.E. have tripwire -m i call something like > mv /etc/tripwire/twpol.txt /etc/tripwire/twpol.txt.org > blowup.pl /etc/tripwire/twpol.txt.org /etc/tripwire/twpol.txt > and then continue on. Ofcourse twpol.txt and /etc/tripwire > would change > based on the params. > > H > > > >From: Ron Forrester <ro...@tr...> > >To: "Tripwire-Dev (E-mail)" <tri...@li...> > >Subject: [Tripwire-dev] crafting better policy files - wildcards? > >Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:21:30 -0800 > > > > > >I just realized I would really rather carry these dicussions > on with the > >mailing list as opposed to the forum... > > > >So, as to the idea of using comments to manage the change > from regex's to > >expanded rules. It is certainly workable, but not ideal. If > you change one > >or two of the regex's, you also have to delete all the > expanded rules > >before > >running it through expansion again. > > > >It seems to me, reasonable solution would be one where tripwire could > >properly use the policy file with regex's intact. To do > this, it seems > >tripwire would need to create an additional working file > upon database > >init. > >This working file would basically be the policy file with > regex's expanded > >-- when integrity checks were run, this version of the > policy file would be > >used since it would have the rules as they expanded at > dbinit or policy > >update time. This file would get recreated upon a new db > init or policy > >update (I think). This way, the original policy file stays > in the original > >form, and is used only to create this secondary representation. > > > >Thoughts, comments? > >cheers, > >rjf& > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: no...@so... [mailto:no...@so...] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:08 PM > > > To: no...@so... > > > Subject: [tripwire - Open Discussion] RE: crafting better > > > policy files - > > > wildcards? > > > > > > > > > Read and respond to this message at: > > > http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=75540 > > > By: japhar81 > > > > > > Alright, how about this: > > > Trippy goes through, comments out the regexp with a lovely #, > > > and inserts the > > > exploded list, I.E. > > > /usr/sbin//somexp// > > > becomes: > > > # /usr/sbin//somexp// > > > # Trippy Explode Here > > > /usr/sbin/file1 > > > /usr/sbin/file2 > > > /usr/sbin/file3 > > > # Trippy Explode End > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor > > > this forum. > > > To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge and visit: > > > http://sourceforge.net/forum/monitor.php?forum_id=9175 > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > ___________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _______________________________________________ Tripwire-dev mailing list Tri...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/tripwire-dev |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-17 17:13:21
|
Sorry I've been out of touch, been setting up Qt 2.2.2 so I can work on trippy. I've actually got a working config file editor now, yay! CVS code coming soon. Anyways, your idea seems great. In fact, the overhead of that would be trivial. Just add a shell-out to a perl script that blows up the regexp to the -m i code, and you're all set.. I.E. have tripwire -m i call something like mv /etc/tripwire/twpol.txt /etc/tripwire/twpol.txt.org blowup.pl /etc/tripwire/twpol.txt.org /etc/tripwire/twpol.txt and then continue on. Ofcourse twpol.txt and /etc/tripwire would change based on the params. H >From: Ron Forrester <ro...@tr...> >To: "Tripwire-Dev (E-mail)" <tri...@li...> >Subject: [Tripwire-dev] crafting better policy files - wildcards? >Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:21:30 -0800 > > >I just realized I would really rather carry these dicussions on with the >mailing list as opposed to the forum... > >So, as to the idea of using comments to manage the change from regex's to >expanded rules. It is certainly workable, but not ideal. If you change one >or two of the regex's, you also have to delete all the expanded rules >before >running it through expansion again. > >It seems to me, reasonable solution would be one where tripwire could >properly use the policy file with regex's intact. To do this, it seems >tripwire would need to create an additional working file upon database >init. >This working file would basically be the policy file with regex's expanded >-- when integrity checks were run, this version of the policy file would be >used since it would have the rules as they expanded at dbinit or policy >update time. This file would get recreated upon a new db init or policy >update (I think). This way, the original policy file stays in the original >form, and is used only to create this secondary representation. > >Thoughts, comments? >cheers, >rjf& > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: no...@so... [mailto:no...@so...] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:08 PM > > To: no...@so... > > Subject: [tripwire - Open Discussion] RE: crafting better > > policy files - > > wildcards? > > > > > > Read and respond to this message at: > > http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=75540 > > By: japhar81 > > > > Alright, how about this: > > Trippy goes through, comments out the regexp with a lovely #, > > and inserts the > > exploded list, I.E. > > /usr/sbin//somexp// > > becomes: > > # /usr/sbin//somexp// > > # Trippy Explode Here > > /usr/sbin/file1 > > /usr/sbin/file2 > > /usr/sbin/file3 > > # Trippy Explode End > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor > > this forum. > > To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge and visit: > > http://sourceforge.net/forum/monitor.php?forum_id=9175 > > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
From: Ron F. <ro...@tr...> - 2000-11-15 22:21:18
|
I just realized I would really rather carry these dicussions on with the mailing list as opposed to the forum... So, as to the idea of using comments to manage the change from regex's to expanded rules. It is certainly workable, but not ideal. If you change one or two of the regex's, you also have to delete all the expanded rules before running it through expansion again. It seems to me, reasonable solution would be one where tripwire could properly use the policy file with regex's intact. To do this, it seems tripwire would need to create an additional working file upon database init. This working file would basically be the policy file with regex's expanded -- when integrity checks were run, this version of the policy file would be used since it would have the rules as they expanded at dbinit or policy update time. This file would get recreated upon a new db init or policy update (I think). This way, the original policy file stays in the original form, and is used only to create this secondary representation. Thoughts, comments? cheers, rjf& > -----Original Message----- > From: no...@so... [mailto:no...@so...] > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:08 PM > To: no...@so... > Subject: [tripwire - Open Discussion] RE: crafting better > policy files - > wildcards? > > > Read and respond to this message at: > http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=75540 > By: japhar81 > > Alright, how about this: > Trippy goes through, comments out the regexp with a lovely #, > and inserts the > exploded list, I.E. > /usr/sbin//somexp// > becomes: > # /usr/sbin//somexp// > # Trippy Explode Here > /usr/sbin/file1 > /usr/sbin/file2 > /usr/sbin/file3 > # Trippy Explode End > > ______________________________________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor > this forum. > To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge and visit: > http://sourceforge.net/forum/monitor.php?forum_id=9175 > |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-10 13:47:42
|
I submitted a request to sourceforge yesterday to start a project to develop a GUI for setup, deployment, and day-to-day use of tripwire (cross-platform). I'm still waiting to hear on it, but I believe it will be approved. Any developers interesting in this, please drop me a line (kde...@ho...). Henry _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2000-11-10 00:02:53
|
IRC can be a pretty cool tool for a disperse group of people working on a project, and it is something I have wanted to get going for the tripwire project. It will be a few weeks before I can get a box setup here to host that, so until then I would like to propose we use the OpenProjects IRC network. The list of servers they have is here: http://openprojects.nu/services/irc.html Joining a channel on any of those servers automatically puts you on a channel on all of those servers, so it shouldn't matter which one you use, pick one close to you. I will hang out in "#ost" as 'rjf' should anyone want to chat about the project, ask questions, etc. Let me know if you have any questions about this. cheers, rjf& |
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2000-11-08 00:19:12
|
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:01:59PM +0000, Henry Zektser wrote: > 1) Can we actually do stuff to the cvs code yet? I'm going to be > ready to code tonight (my floppy drive for my laptop is coming in). Currently only I have write access to cvs. It is my intention to manage the project somewhat traditionally... By that I mean, most projects start out with some core developer who has write access -- people submit patches which get integrated into cvs by the core developer, or rejected, etc.. As a particular contributor becomes more active he or she would probably gain write access to cvs. So I would ask, does that make sense? (this is my first time at this). > 2) GUI, GUI, GUI. Web, Windows, Qt, whatever, we need to do GUI. I'm > wondering if we should perhaps split off a group independent of the > main tripwire program to code up various GUIs (specifically, web, > native linux, Well now, we are talking a whole different ball game here. While I would be interested in supporting developers on a project like this, I don't think it is appropriate to live in the tripwire cvs or sourceforge project page. It is better as a separate sourceforge project, and I will be happy to work with the other project to make things progress in a meaningful manner. Does that make sense? cheers, rjf& |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-07 22:02:05
|
Two things... 1) Can we actually do stuff to the cvs code yet? I'm going to be ready to code tonight (my floppy drive for my laptop is coming in). 2) GUI, GUI, GUI. Web, Windows, Qt, whatever, we need to do GUI. I'm wondering if we should perhaps split off a group independent of the main tripwire program to code up various GUIs (specifically, web, native linux, and windows hooking into the linux box to config it). Something on the level of Oracle's enterprise manager. Ron, since you guys own this stuff, what do you think? Can we get away with a separate group, and will tripwire support us? H _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-06 18:51:46
|
Well, I tend to write alot of code between compiles, and even more between test runs. So my thought was, write at work, build at work (NT-shop, no linux), and then test at home. But I have a spifty Dell Lattitude that I'm gonna use exclusively for trippin. Just a curiousity question. By the way, when are you gpl'ing the windows code? ;P H >From: Ron Forrester <rj...@sk...> >To: tri...@li... >Subject: Re: [Tripwire-dev] NDAs and design docs >Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 10:25:16 -0800 > >On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 04:49:11PM +0000, Henry Zektser wrote: > > 1) Can we just send to the list instead of each-other with CC's? I'm > > starting to get a headache trying to keep up with the duped emails, > > since I get both list and the one I'm addressed/CCd on. Or is there > > a reason for doing that? Just a thought. > >Probably my bad -- I have been hitting "group reply" in mutt and it >grabs everyone... > > > 2) Do we have any options as far as developing on windows and > > running on linux? I'm trying to coax cygwin into building tripwire, > > but I need gmake right now, so I'm gonna snag and attempt to install > > that. Just curious if your developers have any ideas on this. Again, > > just my .02c. > >I have not done anything with tripwire and cygwin -- however, it's my >understanding that cygwin creates win32 binaries, so unless you are >talking about some kind of cross compiling scenario, I don't think it >will work. > >cheers, >rjf& >_______________________________________________ >Tripwire-dev mailing list >Tri...@li... >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/tripwire-dev _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2000-11-06 18:25:21
|
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 04:49:11PM +0000, Henry Zektser wrote: > 1) Can we just send to the list instead of each-other with CC's? I'm > starting to get a headache trying to keep up with the duped emails, > since I get both list and the one I'm addressed/CCd on. Or is there > a reason for doing that? Just a thought. Probably my bad -- I have been hitting "group reply" in mutt and it grabs everyone... > 2) Do we have any options as far as developing on windows and > running on linux? I'm trying to coax cygwin into building tripwire, > but I need gmake right now, so I'm gonna snag and attempt to install > that. Just curious if your developers have any ideas on this. Again, > just my .02c. I have not done anything with tripwire and cygwin -- however, it's my understanding that cygwin creates win32 binaries, so unless you are talking about some kind of cross compiling scenario, I don't think it will work. cheers, rjf& |
From: Matthew C. <mat...@de...> - 2000-11-06 17:20:19
|
> Thanks Ron, > Two more misc. rants here: > 1) Can we just send to the list instead of each-other with CC's? I'm > starting to get a headache trying to keep up with the duped emails, since I > get both list and the one I'm addressed/CCd on. Or is there a reason for > doing that? Just a thought. This should be an option within the mailing list software to change/play with the reply to address mangling. > 2) Do we have any options as far as developing on windows and running on > linux? I'm trying to coax cygwin into building tripwire, but I need gmake > right now, so I'm gonna snag and attempt to install that. Just curious if > your developers have any ideas on this. Again, just my .02c. gmake should compile. (If I remember correctly.) The problem that you will run into, is lack of other features within th e libraries. Last time I tried, I had to add things like SIG_IGNORE, and fix some other things to get some stuff to compile. Matthew M. Copeland |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-06 16:49:22
|
Thanks Ron, Two more misc. rants here: 1) Can we just send to the list instead of each-other with CC's? I'm starting to get a headache trying to keep up with the duped emails, since I get both list and the one I'm addressed/CCd on. Or is there a reason for doing that? Just a thought. 2) Do we have any options as far as developing on windows and running on linux? I'm trying to coax cygwin into building tripwire, but I need gmake right now, so I'm gonna snag and attempt to install that. Just curious if your developers have any ideas on this. Again, just my .02c. H >From: Ron Forrester <rj...@sk...> >To: Henry Zektser <kde...@ho...> >CC: tri...@li... >Subject: Re: [Tripwire-dev] NDAs and design docs >Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 08:39:43 -0800 > >On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:12:04PM +0000, Henry Zektser wrote: > > actually created;) Would it be possible for us to get a hold of these, >even > > if it did require an NDA or something? Maybe not released to everyone on >the > > project, but a few 'key' individuals who could guide the rest? > >Henry, let me see what I can dig up -- even if I can't release stuff >we already have, I can whip up something new that will at least give >some high level details and places to start. > >cheers, >rjf& _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2000-11-06 16:39:53
|
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:12:04PM +0000, Henry Zektser wrote: > actually created;) Would it be possible for us to get a hold of these, even > if it did require an NDA or something? Maybe not released to everyone on the > project, but a few 'key' individuals who could guide the rest? Henry, let me see what I can dig up -- even if I can't release stuff we already have, I can whip up something new that will at least give some high level details and places to start. cheers, rjf& |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-06 13:12:10
|
Ron, Since we're on this legal talk here, I just thought I'd bring something up. It would be very helpful for those of us hacking at the code to get a glimpse at the original design docs, which I hope and pray your developers actually created;) Would it be possible for us to get a hold of these, even if it did require an NDA or something? Maybe not released to everyone on the project, but a few 'key' individuals who could guide the rest? H _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
From: Henry Z. <kde...@ho...> - 2000-11-06 12:58:04
|
I don't see this as a huge problem, provided that the code does get re-released. In effect, we don't license the code at all, we transfer ownership to tripwire, who do the confusing dual-license stuff that we don't really want to deal with anyway;) H >From: Ron Forrester <rj...@sk...> >To: Henry Zektser <kde...@ho...> >CC: tri...@li... >Subject: Re: [Tripwire-dev] A quick note about participation >Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 12:02:59 -0800 > >On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 07:46:35PM +0000, Henry Zektser wrote: > > as long as we, as the OSS community, are protected in some way from > > tripwire saying 'shit, this is too cool to GPL, we'll just keep it > > cuz we have a > >If it gets accepted by me for CVS, that'll never happen, or, let's >just say I'd be moving on... So you have my word that will never >happen while I work there. > >The main purpose is to allow dual licensing -- any copyright >assignment document approved by me and used while I am gatekeeper will >be a contract that says a) the author assigns full copyright to >tripwire, and b) tripwire promises to re-license the code under at >_least_ the GPL, while reserving the right to also release under a >tripwire license. > >Hope this is clear. This is a very important issue to me and I want to >make sure it comes out right. > >rjf& > >_______________________________________________ >Tripwire-dev mailing list >Tri...@li... >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/tripwire-dev _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |