From: mose <mo...@mo...> - 2004-02-16 06:08:14
|
le Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:23:31PM -0500 par broubrou : > Quoting Brian Todoroff <br...@to...>: > > > Yes, it is true that we have started a fork as mose and damian seemed to > > think best. In light of their points about wanting the core to remain in a > > more or less stagnant state to support the current user base and concentrate > > on features, and our needs for a more modular, higher performance core that > > can be restructured for an enterprise environment, several of us got > > together and decided that it was time for a fork based on Tiki 1.8. We > > Can someone explain me why the core Tikiwiki team doesn't want modularity and > high performance? "Spaghetti code" in Tiki is a real problem and it should be > solved long before adding new features. I started browsing the code last week, > and > it is as slow to read as it is to execute :) If the only way to solve that is > by forking, then long life to TikiPro! > > I have needs for high performance and stability, I don't need Tiki to replace my > coffee machine! ;) > - don't mistake, we all have same goal (modularity, high performance and extreme reliability), we just want to use different ways. cheers, mose |