#437 Allow relatedItem in biblFull

AMBER
closed-fixed
Lou Burnard
5
2013-04-22
2013-02-21
Michelle Dalmau
No

relatedItem is allowed in biblStruct and bibl, but not biblFull. I posted a query about this today but no responses. It seems to me like an oversight. I am working on new project which would benefit from this change. For now, we will add it to the ODD.

Discussion

<< < 1 2 (Page 2 of 2)
  • Kevin Hawkins
    Kevin Hawkins
    2013-03-31

    Right. I happen to know that Michelle is very busy over the next week, but I hope she'll tell us why they chose biblFull over biblStruct and bibl for their project.

    In the course of implementing one of the tickets that arose out of http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Ad-hoc_committee_on_encoding_of_bibliographic_citations (I forget which one), I suggested some text explaining a possible use of biblFull elsewhere. This text now appears in the paragraph just before 3.11.1. It's a hypothetical use that in the end is not much more useful than just using bibl.

     
    Last edit: Kevin Hawkins 2013-04-06
  • Kevin Hawkins
    Kevin Hawkins
    2013-04-11

    Even without Michelle weighing on on why she chose biblFull for her bibliographic descriptions, the Council breakout group feels that there is no good reason not to add relatedItem as a child of biblFull. People generally think of biblFull as providing the most functionality of the three "bibl*" elements, it's odd for it to be lacking in this one area.

     
  • Kevin Hawkins
    Kevin Hawkins
    2013-04-11

    LB will make relatedItem a child of notesStmt and make it repeatable.

     
  • Kevin Hawkins
    Kevin Hawkins
    2013-04-11

    • assigned_to: Lou Burnard
     
  • Lou Burnard
    Lou Burnard
    2013-04-22

    • status: open --> closed-fixed
     
  • Lou Burnard
    Lou Burnard
    2013-04-22

    Added as per council decision

     
<< < 1 2 (Page 2 of 2)