#34 <respStmt> needs to be more restrictive.

closed
Lou Burnard
4
2004-09-22
2004-09-05
Syd Bauman
No

The <respStmt> element in P4 is far too permissive. At
a minimum it should be
element respStmt {
attlist.respStmt ,
tei.Incl*,
( name, tei.Incl* ),
(
( resp, tei.Incl* )+
|
( ( name, tei.Incl* )+, ( resp, tei.Incl* ) )
)
}
although perhaps even the tei.Incl class is too
permissive here. See attached paper for detailed
discussion.

Discussion

  • Syd Bauman
    Syd Bauman
    2004-09-05

    paper discussing <respStmt> content P3 to P5

     
    Attachments
  • Lou Burnard
    Lou Burnard
    2004-09-17

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1021146

    What are these tei.Incl elements doing in here anyway? If
    <respStmt> is in the header, they shouldn't be allowed!

    I suggest a content model of ((name, resp?) | (resp, name?))+

     
  • Lou Burnard
    Lou Burnard
    2004-09-22

    • labels: --> TEI: New or Changed Element
    • assigned_to: nobody --> louburnard
    • status: open --> closed