#301 add hi to figDesc

GREEN
closed-accepted
Lou Burnard
5
2011-11-15
2011-05-02
Alice Hickcox
No

figDesc in p4 allowed <hi> in its content. In p5 it does not. In p4 hi is a member of hgphrase, along with "distinct emph foreign gloss mentioned soCalled term title" In p5 hi is a member of model.hiLike, while all the others are members of model.emphLike, and model.hiLike is not included in the content of figDesc, which seems like an oversight.

Discussion

  • I was going to argue that <figDesc> is for occasions when markup is not appropriate, eg for constructing an HTML @alt or @title attribute on <img>, or for rendering in speech.

    But then I looked at what it does allow...

    The mistake, I _think_, is that model.hiLike should be a member of model.limitedContent, not model.emphLike

     
  • Lou Burnard
    Lou Burnard
    2011-11-02

    • milestone: --> GREEN
     
  • Lou Burnard
    Lou Burnard
    2011-11-02

    This is a reclassification proposal then, and quite a big one. Allow model.hiLike in model.limitedContent. All in favour?

     
  • Martin Holmes
    Martin Holmes
    2011-11-03

    There is macro.limitedContent and model.limitedPhrase. Which is intended here?

     
  • Sorry, my fault back in may. model.limitedPhrase. Add hilike to this, and it becomes parallel to emphLike (as it oughta)

     
  • James Cummings
    James Cummings
    2011-11-07

    • assigned_to: nobody --> louburnard
     
  • Lou Burnard
    Lou Burnard
    2011-11-15

    • status: open --> closed-accepted
     
  • Lou Burnard
    Lou Burnard
    2011-11-15

    At rev 9756 added model.hiLike to model.limitedPhrase. Nothing seems to have broken, and <hi>is now available in <figDesc>