Re: [TCLCORE] Substituted error stacks

[Alexandre F. <ale...@gm...>]

On 2/7/08, Donald G Porter <dg...@ni...> wrote:
> Donal K. Fellows wrote:
> > Also, is there any reason why error traces don't use real line numbers
> > as might be retrieved from [info frame]?
> ...
> I think this can be remedied, but I now see it will be a significant
> rewriting project, not a quick add-on making use of in-place facilities.

Then, can we conclude that just the list of [info level 0]s is a local
optimum of the functionality/effort ratio ?

-Alex