From: M G. <aur...@gm...> - 2009-09-15 15:07:49
|
Rehi, > Now that's the one thing I don't understand: what does your framework > actually do? Is it a collection of convenient macros/functions? Does it > add an extension to the language? > > Adding yet another dependency is not a good idea imho. Can't we use > cmake directly? > > Now, while I probably sounded quite negative, I know that auria is quite > keen on replacing autotools, so if she thinks that cmake is the way to > go I won't object - and of course leave it to her to answer the emails > of people asking why they now have to install cmake when autotools was > working fine *evil grin* > > While it's true I keenly welcome replacements to autotools, the alternate framework dependency would kind of be some blocker for inclusion in STK. CMake is getting more and more common, so many (most?) people would have it; but your alternative framework would definitely not. -- Auria |