Re: [SSI-devel] Another rfork bug(s?)

[Roopa P. <pra...@in...>]

On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:20, Maxime Ritter wrote:
> I also noticed that pushing the BREAK key results in a kernel panic instead
> of the kdb prompt. Bug, feature or myself ? (I don't know kdb and never used 
> before so I might have forgot to do something).

The below link talks about the kdb panic fix :

http://www.mail-archive.com/kd...@os.../msg00675.html

I have tried the patch given in the mail message, and got over a similar
problem with my kernel.

Hope this helps.

- Roopa 

> 
> -- 
> Maxime Ritter
> ----
> 

> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <sys/cluster.h>
> 
> int main (int argc, char *arg[])
> {
> 	int i,j,k,l;
> 
> 	printf("(useless) rfork-bomb\n");
> 
> //	for(k=1; k<3; k++)	{
> 		for(j=1; j<3; j++)	{
> 			for(i=1; i<=3; i++)	{
> 				l=rfork(i);
> 				if(l < 0)	{
> 					printf("%d,%d : Error rfork %d\n", clusternode_num(), getpid(),l);
> 					}	
> 				l=rfork(i);
> 				if(l < 0)	{
> 					printf("%d,%d : Error rfork %d\n", clusternode_num(), getpid(),l);
> 					}	
> 			}
> //		}
> 	}
> 	
> 
> 	printf("%d,%d : is alive (not for a long time)\n", clusternode_num(), getpid());
> }
>