Re: [Squirrel-sql-develop] Different Version class in CVS Head and 2.3 branch
A Java SQL client for any JDBC compliant database
Brought to you by:
colbell,
gerdwagner
From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2006-11-14 22:25:17
|
I'll take care of it then. Rob On 11/14/06, Gerd Wagner <bir...@t-...> wrote: > Robert Manning wrote: > > On 11/14/06, Gerd Wagner <bir...@t-...> wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> I just saw that the Version class of CVS Head is different from the one in the > >> 2.3 branch. Is that wanted or a mistake? Probably I didn't follow all of your > >> discussion on the topic. In case I missed something please tell me. > >> > >> As a first rule I think everything new should be right away patched into the > >> main branch. This makes sure nothing gets lost for the future. > >> > >> Please enlighten me. > >> > > > > I made a change to support displaying 2.3.1 instead of 2.x[final|RCn]. > > Is that what you are referring to? > Yes, that's the difference I saw between the 2.3 branch and the head branch. > > > > It was a temporary change since it > > conflicts with the naming convention used in the past. If you want I > > can put it on the trunk as well > If you don't mind I'd prefer that. > > > - does everyone agree that 2.4.0 will > > be the next release version (instead of 2.4 RC1) with bug-fixes going > > into 2.4.1 (as opposed to 2.4 RC2). That will mean dropping the use > > of "final" - which is fine with me. I'm not really sure how we can > > ever say a release is the "final" one; unless of course we don't > > intend to do branches for bug-fixes. What do you all think? > Please go ahead. When I started with the rc/final versions there was not much > intention in it. So I don't mind if you change it. > > Gerd > |