From: Oleg B. <ph...@ph...> - 2006-10-11 15:30:49
|
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:53:50AM -0400, Jorge Vargas wrote: > >Disadvantages: > > > >-- too simple; probably not a big problem for SQLObject 'cause it will > > serve one medium-size project; > what we need that trac doesn't has? Probably nothing. > >-- requires importing of data from the SF tracker; > this should take care of that > http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/tags/trac-0.8.4/contrib/sourceforge2trac.py That's fine! > >-- the pain of switching - old people should change their bookmarks and get > > accustomed with a new interface; > that's the biggest problem, but if the new one is better I'm sure > people's pain will be justified. Correct. > >-- integration with SVN is not going to help this time as our SVN > >repository > > is hosting in a different place; > I google around and we can still use this > http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracFaq#can-i-use-trac-with-a-remote-subversion-repository Well, SVK is a rather large tool, and svnsync requires Subversion 1.4. Anyway, that's interesting. > >-- free hosting limit disk space to 50MB. > how big is the SO repo in disk? I don't know. I don't have admin rights at SF. We can ask Ian about it. CC'ing the message to him. > > The offered hosting is http://www.webfaction.com/freetrac > one thing you didn't miss is that > webfaction free trac is stuck at 0.8.4 This (and the disk space) is not a big problem now because I have received another private offer to host Trac for SQLObject. > alternatively trac itself, the tickets and wiki are not a big push in > server resources we can ask Ian to host it at colorstudy.com ? I don't know how big is the trouble of installing and administering Trac. If there is little trouble it would be the best as we can have SVN, tickets and wiki integrated at one host. Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ ph...@ph... Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN. |