From: Andy Sy <an...@ne...> - 2009-03-01 10:03:42
|
Hi All, >> Ed wrote: >> >> I see form the archives of this list and the Spyced Blog that Spyce >> seems to be dead. This is disappointing. Spyce is stable, feature-complete and bugfree as it is, so lack of new development is not really a problem, unless you require constant novelty to keep yourself from getting bored in a technology. If you look at it in hindsight, change is actually a pain in the neck... ;-P ! > Philip wrote: > > Mako is a my choice. IMO it is a lot like Spyce in that it provides > what you need and then gets out of the way. That said, I also do get the urge for novelty every so often, and after looking around, also came to the independent conclusion that Mako would be the most suitable successor to Spyce. Like Spyce, it seems to require very little additional relearning beyond the vanilla Python experience. ======================== http://www.neotitans.com Web and IT Consulting |