From: Bokhan A. <ap...@ng...> - 2012-02-29 16:57:20
|
29.02.2012 13:34, Christian Franke пишет: > Alex Samorukov wrote: >> Hi Artem, >> >> Initially it was done because i found that SAT can easily degrade >> raid and in the worst case - destroy the array. Later i identified >> "unsafe" commands and blocked them in the code (for Linux and >> FreeBSD) and now on all my arrays (about ~30 i guess) "smatctl -x >> /dev/sda" do not cause any problems. So its _probably_ safe to remove >> this. It would be great to see feedback from other users/developers >> before final decision. >> > > I would suggest to add a new -d option (e.g. -d megaraid,N,auto) to > enable SAT auto-detection on demand: That would be great |