From: Jon N. <jn...@ja...> - 2007-05-14 19:26:32
|
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > On Sat 12 May 2007 07:21:10 NZST +1200, Jon Nelson wrote: > > > hope somebody can answer some questions. If I need to subscribe to the > > list, let me know. > > Non-subscriber postings need manual moderator approval, and you'd have > to read postings by other means. Subscribed. > > 1. The Hardware_ECC_Recovered value is ginormous, and neither > > -F samsung nor -F samsung2 seems to work. > > Normal for Samsung disks AFAICT. Ignore the value, it seems to have no > useful purpose. OK. > > 4. I sure hope this disk is a good one, I'll be relying on it for the > > next 5 years or so. > > You're joking, right? Rely on a hard disk and you are lost... Of course not -- this is 1/3 of a RAID5. I just hate having to buy hardware before it's time. I even purchased 3 drives from 3 diff. manufacturers - Seagate 7200.10, Samsung, and Hitachi. The Seagate was DOA within 2 hours, so I'm running in degraded mode until then. :-( (With a complete backup available). Thanks for the notes! -- When it comes to Linux, you are either on the train or on the tracks. Jon Nelson <jn...@ja...> |