From: Michael L. <mik...@ma...> - 2009-09-21 18:54:01
|
On Sep 21, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Chris Nandor wrote: > >> On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:26, Larson, Timothy E. wrote: >> >>> I think it comes down to "why deploy two servers if you can do >>> one?" Most people these days, if they're going Apache, are going >>> Apache2. Apache isn't exactly lightweight. So deploying a second >>> heavy server just to run slash seems overkill for something that >>> ought to be much more straightforward. That's my take on it. >> >> I hear you, but that is not a problem for Slashdot, of course. So >> the >> question for *us* -- considering resources we'd have to devote to >> make >> a change -- is of what's inherently better about Apache2 that would >> justify the change for us. > > One thing to note along this thread ... is Apache 1.x even considered > "dead" yet? When did 1.3.41 come out? Wasn't it just recently? > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. > sc...@hu... http://www.hub.org > > Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:sc...@hu... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart > your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and > stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register > now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general |