I get it, thanks for the explanation ;)


2013/8/21 nap <naparuba@gmail.com>



On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Jean-Michel Collongette <jean.mich.c@gmail.com> wrote:
So with .pack and pack.json we double information about a pack isn't it?


No, you are mixing pack and package. A .pack is to describe what a pack configuration is proposing, while a package is just for a whole package thing, so can be a module. The .pack is not mantatory, it will be mainly used by configuration tool to know how to configure hosts that are using this pack (which macro, etc etc). 

So these 2 things are ortogonal, there is no problem there. The only thing are their names in fact that are maybe to close :p


Jean 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel




--
Jean-Michel Collongette
jean.mich.c@gmail.com