On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Gerhard Lausser <Gerhard.Lausser@consol.de> wrote:
Hi,

> change this in the future, or even better, if it is possible
> to have distributed passive service checks in some form with
what exactly do you mean by that? From the clients' view there is one
ip-address where nsca messages are to be sent to.
The weak point here is, when Shinken performs an arbiter failover, the
nsca-listener gets another address. I have no idea how to handle this
except by integrating the arbiter in some cluster framework with a virtual
address.
Yes, the only solution is a VIP between the two receiver or arbiter IP. But it's quite easy to setup, so it's not a big deal :)

We can also think about a nsca protocol over multicast too  ;)


Jean
 

Gerhard