Re: [Semediawiki-user] Relational attributes?

[Tony B. <ton...@ka...>]

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:05:50PM +0200, Max V?lkel wrote:
> Yes,  and  we  don't  expect  everything  to  be annotated. Maybe just
> annotating the obvious already brings great value.

It absolutely does. I think Semantic Wikis in general (and Semantic
Mediawiki in particlar) are wonderful. I'd hate to go back to plan
Mediawiki now. I'm just hungry for even more! 

> I     feel    this    discussion    should    be    continued    on
> sw...@ai...   -  it's  a general question in semantic
> wikis  what,  how much and how to annotate. But for Semantic MediaWiki
> we want to stay simple.

I'll take it over there for the general discussion, but just to clarify
the current thoughts specifically here: is the position that something
like this could happen in Semantic MediaWiki if someone found an
acceptably simple interface, and thus we should explore to see if such
thing is actually possible, or that the extra level of indirection is
probably too much for users to deal with conceptually, no matter what
the interface was like, so we're never likely to go there?

Thanks,

Tony