From: Markus K. <ma...@se...> - 2012-10-22 09:03:24
|
On 21/10/12 11:13, Federico Leva wrote: > Hello, > > Markus Krötzsch, 19/10/2012 08:07: >> Great, thanks a lot. I hope Nemo (Federico; CC) has seen this too. > > Yes, I've seen it and I've just started assigning requests to Karsten. > Note, however, that in general they are not only about documentation, > and I don't know if Karsten is also willing to commit patches for > gender, grammar, plural support and so on when needed. Requests that need changes to the code should be submitted to bugzilla as usual. Anybody can take any bug from there and submit a patch (in the best case directly through gerrit). Translation-related bugs do not require a special handling here. In general, we can always use help in monitoring/processing input from bugzilla. This does not even require patches -- assessing, verifying, and classifying bugs would already help. Even filtering out the invalid/worksforme bugs would make a big contribution. But I18N requests are not special here. Markus >>> >>> My recommendation to coders is to incluce message documentation right >>> away. In fact this already done in the >>> meantime in most cases. >> >> Yes, this is also important for other developers who may need to decide >> if a message is appropriate for new code or not. > |