Hi, Samuel,
Just got a chance to write back, I've busy dealing with jet lag and trick or treat :-)
For developers, the recommended way is to use the WOM Functions directly because you have more control and it'll be faster too.
I'm not sure what caused the error you mentioned, can you send me and Ning (cc-ed here too) more details about the repro of the issue (such as your browser version, OS, etc.)? 
Have a good weekend!
Jesse

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Samuel Lampa <samuel.lampa.l@rilnet.com> wrote:
Hi Jesse (cc SMW-devel, if someone else has some input),

I'm looking into using the WOM extension in RDFIO.

I was wondering what the recommended way is to access the WOM API from other extensions ... Is it via the API functions (described in http://wiking.vulcan.com/dev/index.php/Extension:Wiki_Object_Model/Apis ), for example via fauxRequest, or by using the WOMProcessor and related functions directly (as seen in http://wiking.vulcan.com/dev/index.php/Extension:Wiki_Object_Model/Functions#WOM_Functions )?

I guess both might work(?), but I was looking for the pros/cons of each, and any other hints?

Cheers,
// Samuel

--
Samuel Lampa
---------------------------------------
 Bioinformatician @ Uppsala University
  Blog: http://saml.rilspace.org
---------------------------------------