Yeah, that was one of the requirements to the developers - tag release
On 02/25/2013 07:24 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
> As to creating new Semantic Bundles on the fly that match some criteria
> - i.e., using some set of Git tags - that gets complicated by the fact
> that not all of the extensions have consistent tagging. Some (like, I'm
versions of their extensions in git.
> afraid to say, Semantic Forms Inputs, don't have any tags) - there areOuch, that hurt. :D
That's only because there was no release of SFI since the switch to git.
Have a look at the old SVN repo and you will find tags galore.
Agreed, they will not help.
> the automatic tags applied for MediaWiki versions, but those are not
> reliable as far as guaranteeing either compatibility or stability of the
Ok, I'd still like to give it a try. If it does not work, we are not
> In general, ensuring the compatibility of Semantic Bundle is about the
> level of difficulty one would expect for a package holding 22
> extensions, with varying levels of maintenance for each. Of course, some
worse off. If it does work, me pestering the devs might actually get
them to tag their extensions consistently and think about and state