Yes. Categories and properties are very flexible - I would say its a great data model. But it takes a lot of leg work to get it going.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Brian <Brian.Mingus@colorado.edu> wrote:
It doesn't really support the import of ontologies. They seem to have veered away from the direction of providing an easy way to import standard formats, and no doubt this is because implementing all the details of the format would take a tremendous amount of work. The ontology import code has been broken for a long time, and as evident from the shortness of the script, not much effort was ever put into it.
So each SMW installation has to use its own ontology?
Can they at least declare mappings to well known vocabulary within the RDFS/OWL definitions?