Re: [sdcc-devel] Shall we do 2.3?

[<da...@kd...>]

On 16 Jul, Michael Hope wrote:
> I was wondering if we should spin 2.3.0 later this week.  It seems that we
> have enough changes, and enough time elapsed to justify it.  As I see it
> the changes are:
> 
> * New cpp
> * Many bug fixes
> * z80 port now reasonably integrated, including libs
> * The changes to va_args
> * Documentation updates
> * ds390 support (was this in the last?)
> 

#@$&^% ...and I just updated the web page a few days ago too.
We could do this bassackwards from the kernel, odd versions are
releases and even are dev's. ;-)

Add:
	regression tests (a start)
	examples
	more command line switches
	naked functions
	better printf via the va_args fix
	more logical file/dir layout

Possible:
	borland builds?
	mingw32 builds?
	rpm build?
	short doc on deviation from ansi c

While everyone already knows the above.. it would be good to put on a
list of changes to go with the next release.

I would like to see any official release, 2.3.0 would be good.  The
bugtracker on sourceforge could help shake down the .0 release.

-- 
Dave

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Helton, KD0YU    - da...@re...  - http://www.kd0yu.com
Real World Computing  - 319-386-4041                 - 8am-5pm CST    
Linux/Novell/NT | Servers/Workstations | Consulting | Internet Technologies 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet