From: Karl B. <ka...@tu...> - 2002-02-08 19:04:56
|
I would not recommend anyone use the debugger for anything. We need to de-emphasize the debugger in the doc and web page until a someone comes along who can make it work better than it does now. Maybe code up a printf("This debugger is not so good..."); warning message in it.. Z80 dissasembly/simulation in ucSim is new, I added it a few weeks ago and got it to where it will compile and run our regression tests without error. Otherwise, the simulation has not been run on much else, and it is new code so more than likely it is not perfect. Michael Hope, who is the one that wrote the Z80 code generator for SDCC has been using a different Z80 simulator for a long time now for the regression tests. You can get these by checking out of CVS "sdcc-extra". His tends to be a bare-bones simulator, good for raw speed/small c hack. ucSim tends to be aimed less at speed and more at debugging, source-code readability, and ease of extending. There are other z80 simulators that you can find out on the web as well. I'd be interested in your notes if you use the z80 ucsim tools. Karl. Felipe Massia Pereira wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to use the debugger and the simulator with Z80 Intel Hex > images. Should they work ok? Or the simulator is not working with z80 yet? > > thanks in advance, > -- > Felipe Massia Pereira <http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~ra000493> > > > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > > > |