Re: [sdcc-devel] State of the optralloc-hc08 branch

[Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...>]

On 04.05.2012 20:22, Erik Petrich wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 3 May 2012, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> 
>> I do not see any regression failures and do not know of any bugs
>> in the optralloc-hc08 branch. There are a few things related to
>> the work done there that IMO should be done, but I think they
>> could (and probably should) be done after merging the
>> optralloc-hc08 branch:
>> 
>> * Right operand for GET_VALUE_AT_ADDRESS. * Review peephole rules
>> (the new allocator results in different code being generated, so
>> some old peephole rules may be unnecessary, while some new
>> peephole rules will be desirable). * Make --stack-auto the
>> default.
>> 
>> Erik, what is your opinion on merging the optralloc-hc08 branch?
>> Are there any bugs (e.g. visible only on some architectures or
>> with certain command-line options) that need to be resolved
>> before the merge?
>> 
>> Philipp
> 
> It seems to be working properly, both as-is and with --stack-auto
> as the default. While I can also think of a few more improvements,
> it's nothing drastic that should prevent merging back to trunk
> now.
> 
> Erik

>From the snapshot regression results, in seems to SIGSEGV crash on
Solaris, both sparc and x86.

Philipp