this kind of portability (between compilers for a target) is good for work related to code generation

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Antonio Todo Bom <antonio@projetos.etc.br> wrote:
Is There someone analyzing the document?
http://www.microchip.com/mplabxc8guide

Specially the Chapter 2, about CCI (Common C Interface)

Think that some changes in the newest SDCC version are very near to this
idea, i.e. CONFIG pragma

Well... IMHO, could be good to follow the same syntax to promote a standard
and encourage the portability from XC8 and others to SDCC in the future.

We are not so far this. I.e. __asm could have an replace macro as asm()
(2.5.15 at that doc), but interrupts declarations are so far this that I
cannot think how to do this.

Comments?

Regards,

Antonio Augusto Todo Bom Neto
Boole Embedded


--
http://www.google.com/profiles/john.douglas.pritchard