#228 Equation 4 on p.38 appears wrong

closed
nobody
5
2014-06-13
2012-07-30
Michael Hucka
No

In 2009, Stefan Hoops brought up the fact that eq. 4 on p. 38 doesn't look correct. Note that the exponents are different on the {u_b1}, {u_b2}, etc. terms on the left and right hand sides.

What needs to be done: check if it's really incorrect, and file a tracker issue if it is, then lead it through the process to produce an official erratum notice.

Discussion

  • Chris Myers
    Chris Myers
    2012-08-01

    I am accepting this issue as valid.

     
  • Sarah Keating
    Sarah Keating
    2012-08-05

    I agree with the proposed change and that it should be done.

     
  • I am accepting this issue as valid.

     
    • status: open --> pending
     
  • Lucian Smith
    Lucian Smith
    2014-04-04

    • status: pending --> accepted
    • Group: Reported-Proposed --> Accept-no-conformance-implications
     
  • Lucian Smith
    Lucian Smith
    2014-04-04

    Investigating this, it looks like this was indeed changed for L3v1, and should presumably change for L2v5 as well. Setting the flags appropriately, and will add to the L2v4 errata list.

     
  • Lucian Smith
    Lucian Smith
    2014-06-13

    Thanks to Stefan and Sarah, this has now been fixed in SVN, and will be incorporated into the upcoming release of the L2v5 specification.

     
  • Lucian Smith
    Lucian Smith
    2014-06-13

    • status: accepted --> closed