From: David S. <da...@da...> - 2004-04-25 02:37:35
|
This fixes a minor annoyance. I can not tell from the CLHS what the actual correct behavior for open/with-open-file is in the absence of the code I added. I just know that open seems to fail without it when testing something completely different. $ cvs diff threads.impure.lisp Index: threads.impure.lisp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/tests/threads.impure.lisp,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -r1.8 threads.impure.lisp 21c21 < (with-open-file (o "threads-foreign.c" :direction :output) --- > (with-open-file (o "threads-foreign.c" :direction :output :if-exists :supersede) -- I wouldn't mind the rat race so much if it wasn't for all the damn cats. |
From: Christophe R. <cs...@ca...> - 2004-05-04 10:44:49
|
David Steuber <da...@da...> writes: > This fixes a minor annoyance. I can not tell from the CLHS what the > actual correct behavior for open/with-open-file is in the absence of > the code I added. I just know that open seems to fail without it > when testing something completely different. Thanks. I have really really this time merged this fix into sbcl-0.8.10.7. Cheers, Christophe -- http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/ +44 1223 510 299/+44 7729 383 757 (set-pprint-dispatch 'number (lambda (s o) (declare (special b)) (format s b))) (defvar b "~&Just another Lisp hacker~%") (pprint #36rJesusCollegeCambridge) |