Daniel Barlow <dan_b@...> writes:
> New condition TIMEOUT (inherits from ERROR) is signalled by
> the default SIGALRM handler
Is this right? IGNORE-ERRORS is going to ignore timeout
conditions... is this what you want?
> +;;; should this inherit from error? good question
> +(define-condition timeout (error) ())
Oh, you were wondering that too :-)
I'd have thought that it ought to be a non-error condition, but what
do I know...
http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/ +44 1223 510 299/+44 7729 383 757
(set-pprint-dispatch 'number (lambda (s o) (declare (special b)) (format s b)))
(defvar b "~&Just another Lisp hacker~%") (pprint #36rJesusCollegeCambridge)