From: Tobias C. R. <tc...@fr...> - 2009-06-29 09:45:17
Attachments:
pprint-if.diff
|
The attached patch makes sure that IF forms are pretty-printed such that a mandatory newline is emitted after their ``predicate'', and their ``then'' forms. At the moment it's sometimes pretty-printed as follows (if (foop) (frob-something x) (frob-something-else y z)) -T. |
From: Tobias C. R. <tc...@fr...> - 2009-06-29 13:22:45
|
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" <tc...@fr...> writes: > The attached patch makes sure that IF forms are pretty-printed such that > a mandatory newline is emitted after their ``predicate'', and their > ``then'' forms. Unfortunely this makes walker.impure.lisp fail. The test cases involve string comparasions, and thus depends on the layout produced by the pretty-printer. It probably shouldn't depend on it. -T. |
From: Nikodemus S. <nik...@ra...> - 2009-08-01 07:59:41
|
2009/6/29 Tobias C. Rittweiler <tc...@fr...>: > > The attached patch makes sure that IF forms are pretty-printed such that > a mandatory newline is emitted after their ``predicate'', and their > ``then'' forms. Thank you! Merged in 1.0.30.27, along with a tad more permissive walker.impure.lisp. Cheers, -- Nikodemus |